☆World Mission Society church of God is true church that follows only God's teachings.
Slanderers tell a lie without hesitation that the Church of God spreads a time-limited eschatology. With impure an intention to defame the Church of God, they propagate fabricated and exaggerated false evidence. Recently, one American person has been confusing people with false evidence by distorting a court ruling of Korea. The explanation below will help you easily understand how the ruling was distorted by someone who did not know the whole story at all.
The court ruling that the slanderer suggests as evidence is the “Northern Seoul District Court 2003Gahap6020 Damage Compensation” He insists that this court ruling is evidence that the Church of God spreads a time-limited eschatology.
His argument is an absurd lie. We will explain it, hoping that anyone who reads this will not be confused.
For reference, the case of “Northern Seoul District Court 2003Gahap6020 Damage Compensation” was a civil trial. To understand this case correctly, we need to know the process of the first, second and third criminal trials; because this civil trial was judged on the basis of the second criminal trial. In other words, we need to examine the criminal trial process in order to correctly understand this civil trial.
1. The reason why the court ruling on Tak the publisher of the “Modern Time Religion” Publishing Company was used as false evidence
The cause of the trial
The incident began when Tak, who is the publisher of a religious publishing company “Modern Time Religion” (“HyundaeJongkyo” in Korean), published about 500 books in 2002 where he insisted that the Church of God spreads a time-limited eschatology.
At this, the Church of God filed a lawsuit against him on the charge of libel [defamation through publication], and he was indicted by the prosecution. In the first trial, he was found guilty of defamation through false information, but in the second and third appeals trial,he was found innocent; it was because the court was confused by false evidence and suspended its judgment on whether or not his allegation was true.
Fountainhead of false rumors
All readers must pay attention to some strange points of the slanderers’ insistence.
First, the Internet slanderers do not mention at all the false evidence which Tak submitted.
Second, with the ruling that the publisher was found innocent, they induce a false conclusion that the Church of God spreads a time-limited eschatology.
However, slanderers are proliferating every kind of unsubstantiated rumor on the Internet, excluding the two aforementioned points. For reference, Korean members do not waver in faith by their lies because they already know the truth. So, the slanders are spreading the lies to people in other countries, who do not know the true information. In other words, they are crafty.
Their deeds remind us of the prophecy in the Bible.
1 Pe 5:8 Be self-controlled and alert. Your enemy the devil prowls around like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour.
Mt 23:15 “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when he becomes one, you make him twice as much a son of hell as you are.”
2. In dubio pro reo
Let us examine the false evidence of the Modern Time Religion Company, which Internet slanderers do not mention at all
In the first trial, the publisher was found guilty of defamation through false information, but in the second and third appeals trials, he was found innocent. It was because the court was unable to conclude whether or not his argument was true. The ruling says, “There are some incorrect expressions and exaggerations, but it cannot be concluded that they are all false.”
In other words, the first trial concluded that it was definitely false, but the second and third trials found it difficult to conclude that it was definitely false.
Why was the ruling changed?
.
.
.
http://wmscog.org/
No comments:
Post a Comment